Episode 1 – Profiling
Canter, D. (2003). Mapping murder: the secrets of geographical profiling. London: Virgin.
Canter, D., & Allison, L. (2000). Profiling rape and murder. Dartmouth: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Canter, D., & Larkin, P. (1993). The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 63-69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80215-4
Canter, D., & Youngs, D. (2009). Investigative psychology: Offender profiling and the analysis of criminal action: John Wiley & Sons.
Douglas, J., Burgess, A. W., Burgess, A. G., & Ressler, R. K. (2013). Crime Classification Manual: A Standard System for Investigating and Classifying Violent Crimes (3rd ed.): Wiley.
Hazelwood, R.R. & Warren, J. (2001) The sexually violent offender: Impulsive or ritualistic? In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigation: A multidisciplinary approach, ed. R.R. Hazelwood and A.W. Burgess, 3rd ed., 97-113, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kocsis, R. N. (2006). Criminal profiling: principles and practice. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press.
Kocsis, R. N. (2007). Criminal profiling: international theory, research and practice. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press.
Meaney R.(2004). Commuters and Marauders: an examination of the spatial behaviour of serial criminals. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,1(2) 121-137.
Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome and process study. Law and Human Behavior, 14(3), 215-233. doi: 10.1007/BF01352750
Rossmo, D. K. (1999). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
Salfati, C. G., & Canter, D. V. (1999). Differentiating Stranger Murders: Profiling Offender Characteristics from Behavioral Styles. Behav. Sci. Law, 17, 391-406.
Turvey, B. E. (2012). Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Episode 2 – Eyewitness testimony
Blank, H., & Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
Blank, H., Ost, J., Davies, J., Jones, G., Lambert, K., & Salmon, K. (2013). Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 635-641. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.006
Brigham, J., & Bothwell, R. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7(1), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01045284
Cowan, S., Read, J. D., & Lindsay, D. S. (2014). Predicting and postdicting eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(1), 21-30.
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(2), 83-88.
Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2011). Of guns and geese: a meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 35-66. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview: Charles C Thomas, Publisher.
Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of the actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 722-727. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.722
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 401.
Greenberg, D. L. (2004). President Bush's false [flashbulb] memory of 9/11/01. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 363-370.
Hastie, R., Landsman, R., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: The dangers of guessing. Jurimetrics Journal, 1-8.
Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42-52.
Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1-2), 3-27. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414991
Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 58-69. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.58
Loftus, E. F. (1996). Eyewitness testimony: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585-589. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Morgan I, C. A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 11-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.002
Pezdek, K. (2003). Event memory and autobiographical memory for the events of September 11, 2001. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(9), 1033-1045.
Smith, M. C. (1983). Hypnotic memory enhancement of witnesses: Does it work? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 387-407. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.387
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373. doi: 10.1037/h0020071
Episode 3 – Eyewitness identification
Blank, H., Ost, J., Davies, J., Jones, G., Lambert, K., & Salmon, K. (2013). Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 635-641. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.006
Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 691-695. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.691
Brewer, N., Weber, N., Wootton, D., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Identifying the Bad Guy in a Lineup Using Confidence Judgments Under Deadline Pressure. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1208-1214. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441217
Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 11-30. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11
Brewer, N., & Williams, K. D. (2005). Psychology and law: An empirical perspective: Guilford Press.
Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 575-604. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-7121-1
Farah, M. Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision, 1990: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 628-634. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.628
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105(3), 482-498. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2011). Of guns and geese: a meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 35-66. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
Frowd, C. D., Pitchford, M., Bruce, V., Jackson, S., Hepton, G., Greenall, M., . . . Hancock, P. J. B. (2011). The psychology of face construction: Giving evolution a helping hand. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 195-203. doi: 10.1002/acp.1662
Frowd, C. D., Skeleton, F. C., Atherton, C., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2012). Evolving an identifiable face of a criminal. The Psychologist, 25(2), 116-119.
Greathouse, S. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2009). Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x
Lindsay, R. C., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 556-564. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13(5), 585-589.
Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(4), 482-489. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.482
Morgan I, C. A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 11-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.002
Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 315-327. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 459-473. doi: 10.1023/A:1012888715007
Wells, G. L. (1985). The Psychology of Lineup Identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(2), 89-103.
Wells, G. L. (2014). Eyewitness Identification: Probative Value, Criterion Shifts, and Policy Regarding the Sequential Lineup. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 11-16. doi: 10.1177/0963721413504781
Wiseman, R., West, D., & Stemman, R. (1996). An experimental test of psychic detection. Journal-Society For Psychical Research, 61, 34-45.
Wixted, J. T., Gronlund, S. D., & Mickes, L. (2014). Policy Regarding the Sequential Lineup Is Not Informed by Probative Value but Is Informed by Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 17-18. doi: 10.1177/0963721413510934
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141-145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
Episode 4 – Detecting deception
Baldwin, J. (1992). Rethinking police interrogation in England and Wales: New York University School of Law, Center for Research in Crime and Justice.
Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 131-151. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of Deception Judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214-234. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477-492. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
Brandon, L. G. (2008). Judging Innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108(1), 55-142. doi: 10.2307/40041767
Burgoon, J. K., Newton, D. A., Walther, J. B., & Baesler, E. J. (1989). Nonverbal expectancy violations and conversational involvement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 97-119.
Cherryman, J., & Bull, R. (2000). Police officers' perceptions of specialist investigative interviewing skills. Int'l J. Police Sci. & Mgmt., 3, 199.
Davis, M., & Hadiks, D. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106, 5-54.
DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behaviour and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 203-243.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74-118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
DePaulo, P. J., & DePaulo, B. M. (1989). Can deception by salespersons and customers be detected through nonverbal behavioral cues? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(18), 1552-1577.
Drizin, S., & Colgan, B. (2004). Tales from the Juvenile Confession Front. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment (Vol. 20, pp. 127-162): Springer US
Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? Am Psychol, 46(9), 913-920.
Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers' credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 254-275. doi: 10.1080/00207590344000411
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1994). The effects of interrogative pressure on strategic coping. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1(4), 309-318. doi: 10.1080/10683169508411968
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). Psychology brings justice: the science of forensic psychology. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 13(3), 159-167. doi: 10.1002/cbm.539
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2008). Persons at Risk During Interviews in Police Custody: the Royal Commission Studies The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions (pp. 57-74): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Hasel, L. E., & Kassin, S. M. (2009). On the Presumption of Evidentiary Independence: Can Confessions Corrupt Eyewitness Identifications? Psychological Science, 20(1), 122-126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x
Hasel, L. E., & Kassin, S. M. (2012). False confessions Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 53-77). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
Henkel, L. A., Coffman, K. A. J., & Dailey, B. A. E. M. (2008). A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(5), 555-584. doi: 10.1002/bsl.826
Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 252-259. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.252
Iacono, W. G. (2007). Obituary: David T. Lykken (1928-2006). American Psychologist, 62(4), 319. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.319
Inbau, F., Reid, J., & Buckley, J. (1986). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions (3rd ed.). United States: Williams & Wilkins.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221-233. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221
Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23(5), 499-516. doi: 10.1023/A:1022330011811
Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation. Psychological Science, 7(3), 125-128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469-484.
Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced Confessions and the Jury: An Experimental Test of the Harmless Error Rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21(1), 27-46.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior Confessions and Mock Juror Verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 133-146. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00698.x
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1, 15-29.
Kozel, F. A., Padgett, T. M., & George, M. S. (2004). A Replication Study of the Neural Correlates of Deception. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118(4), 852-856. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.852
Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. B. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 784-798. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.784
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Abbott, C. B. (2007). Does the type of prompt affect the accuracy of information provided by alleged victims of abuse in forensic interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1117-1130. doi: 10.1002/acp.1318
Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Bilker, W. B., Ruparel, K., Childress, A. R., Busch, S. I., & Gur, R. C. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26(4), 262-272. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20191
Leach, A.-M. (2012). Detecting deception Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 35-52). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
Leo, R. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: the changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law and Social Change, 18(1-2), 35-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00230624
Leo, R. A., & Drizin, S. A. (2010). The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. In G. D. L. C. A. Meissner (Ed.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 9-30). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York, US: Plenum Press.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting True Lies: Police Officers' Ability to Detect Suspects' Lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 137-149. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
Madon, S., Yang, Y., Smalarz, L., Guyll, M., & Scherr, K. C. (2013). How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 37(1), 60-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000011
McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273-2303. doi: 10.1177/0886260513518843
Meissner, C., & Kassin, S. (2004). “You’re Guilty, So Just Confess!”. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment (Vol. 20, pp. 85-106): Springer US
Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Interviewing Suspects Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (2nd ed.). West Sussex: McGraw-Hill
Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M., & Williamson, T. M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 23-40.
Moston, S. J., & Stephenson, G. (1992). Predictors of suspect and interviewer behaviour during police questioning Psychology and law: international perspectives. (pp. 212-218). Berlin: De Gruyter
Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N. D., & Meyer, J. R. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. American Psychologist, 61(4), 286-304. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.286
Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2010). The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 57-75. doi: 10.1348/135532509X433151
Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 643-658.
Redlich, A., Summers, A., & Hoover, S. (2010). Self-Reported False Confessions and False Guilty Pleas among Offenders with Mental Illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 79-90. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
Redlich, A. D. (2007). Double jeopardy in the interrogation room for youths with mental illness. American Psychologist, 62(6), 609-611. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X62.6.609
Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 141-156. doi: 10.1023/A:1022543012851
Reinhard, M.-A., Greifeneder, R., & Scharmach, M. (2013). Unconscious processes improve lie detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 721-739. doi: 10.1037/a0034352
Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., & Hart, S. D. (2010). Forensic psychology and law. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating True and False Confessions Within a Novel Experimental Paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481-486. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
Schug, R. A., Gao, Y., Glenn, A. L., Reskin, M., Yang, Y., & Raine, A. (2010). The developmental evidence base: Neurobiological research and forensic applications. In G. J. Towl & D. A. Crighton (Eds.), Forensic Psychology (pp. 73-87). Chichester, West Sussex: BPS Blackwell
Slepian, M. L., Young, S. G., Rutchick, A. M., & Ambady, N. (2013). Quality of Professional Players’ Poker Hands Is Perceived Accurately From Arm Motions. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2335-2338. doi: 10.1177/0956797613487384
Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility Judgments of Detectives: The Impact of Nonverbal Behavior, Social Skills, and Physical Characteristics on Impression Formation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(5), 601-610. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713915
Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. The Journal of Psychology, 129(1), 15-28.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice: Wiley & Sons.
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities: John Wiley & Sons.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 499-518. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4
Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(1), 65-80.
Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behavior displayed during deception. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 544-562. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00378.x
Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Episode 5
Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Jury trials: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Bruschke, J., & Loges, W. E. (1999). Relationship between pretrial publicity and trial outcomes. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 104-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02819.x
Crowley, M. J., O'Callaghan, M. G., & Ball, P. J. (1994). The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18(1), 89-105.
Devine, D. J. (2012). Jury decision making: The state of the science: NYU Press.
Devine, D. J., Buddenbaum, J., Houp, S., Studebaker, N., & Stolle, D. P. (2009). Strength of Evidence, Extraevidentiary Influence, and the Liberation Hypothesis: Data from the Field. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 136-148. doi: Doi 10.1007/S10979-008-9144-X
Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622-727.
Diamond, S. S., Saks, M. J., & Landsman, S. (1998). Juror Judgments about Liability and Damages: Sources of Viriability and Ways to Increase Consistency. DePaul Law Review, 48, 301.
Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9(2), 179-191.
Ellsworth, P. C. (1993). Some steps between attitudes and verdicts. Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making, 42-64.
Fein, S., McCloskey, A. L., & Tomlinson, T. M. (1997). Can the Jury Disregard that Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1215-1226. doi: 10.1177/01461672972311008
Groscup, J., & Penrod, S. D. (2002). Battle of the Standards for Experts in Criminal Cases: Police v. Psychologists. Seton Hall Law Review, 33, 1141.
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2002). Judging by Heuristic-Cognitive Illusions in Judicial Decision Making. Judicature, 86, 44.
Hans, V. P. (2008). Jury Systems Around the World. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4(1), 275-297. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172319
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1982). Jury selection. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 39-82). New York: Academic Press
Hastie, R. (1994). Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making: Cambridge University Press.
Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding of pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111-119.
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650. doi: 10.1086/266350
Imrich, D. J., Mullin, C., & Linz, D. (1995). Measuring the extent of prejudicial pretrial publicity in major American newspapers: A content analysis. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 94-117.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17(4), 423-442. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(83)90070-3
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (1999). Bias in jurors vs bias in juries: New evidence from the SDS perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80(1), 70-86.
Landsman, S., & Rakos, R. F. (1994). A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 12(2), 113-126. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370120203
Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(7), 619-634. doi: 10.1080/10683160802477757
Liberman, J. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2009). Jury Psychology: Social Aspects of the Trial Processes (Vol. 1): Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Lieberman, J. D. (2011). The Utility of Scientific Jury Selection: Still Murky After 30 Years. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963721410396628
Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (1997). What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(4), 589-644. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.589
Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1988). The benefits of legal psychology: Possibilities, practice and dilemmas. British Journal of Psychology, 79(4), 417-440. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02744.x
Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility: John Wiley & Sons.
Rachlinski, J. J., Johnson, S. L., Wistrich, A. J., & Guthrie, C. (2008). Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges? Notre Dame Law Review, 84, 1195-1246.
Ruva, C., McEvoy, C., & Bryant, J. B. (2007). Effects of pre-trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 45-67. doi: 10.1002/acp.1254
Ruva, C. L., & McEvoy, C. (2008). Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(3), 226-235. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226
Seltzer, R. (2006). Scientific jury selection: Does it work? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2417-2435. doi: Doi 10.1111/J.0021-9029.2006.00110.X
Seltzer, R., Venuti, M. A., & Lopes, G. M. (1991). Juror honesty during the voir dire. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(5), 451-462. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(91)90019-R
Sommers, S. R. (2007). Race and the decision making of juries. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2007(12), 171-187.
Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Juror Verdicts : A Meta-Analytic Review. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 219-235. doi: 10.1023/A:1022325019080
Vidmar, N. (2011). The Psychology of Trial Judging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 58-62. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397283
Visher, C. A. (1987). Juror decision making: The importance of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 1-17.
Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2005). Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153(4), 1251-1345. doi: 10.2307/4150614
Episode 6
Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she's great, she's benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 66-77.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319-322.
Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63-67. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397282
Brown, I., & Hullin, R. (1992). A Study Of Sentencing In The Leeds Magistrates' Courts: The Treatment of Ethnic Minority and White Offenders. British Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 41-53.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Chuan, F. K., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion : An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032-1043.
Canter, D. V., Alison, L. J., Alison, E., & Wentink, N. (2004). The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder: Myth or Model? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(3), 293-320. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.10.3.293
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
Cooper, J., Bennett, E. A., & Sukel, H. L. (1996). Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law & Human Behavior, 20(4), 379-394.
Cooper, J., & Neuhaus, I. M. (2000). The "hired gun" effect: Assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying and credentials on the perception of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 149-171.
Cramer, R. J., Brodsky, S. L., & DeCoster, J. (2009). Expert Witness Confidence and Juror Personality: Their Impact on Credibility and Persuasion in the Courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(1), 63-74.
Dean, K., Wayne, J. H., Mack, D., & Thomas, K. M. (2000). An examination of happiness, racism, and demographics on judgments of guilt. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 816-832.
Devine, D. J., Buddenbaum, J., Houp, S., Studebaker, N., & Stolle, D. P. (2009). Strength of Evidence, Extraevidentiary Influence, and the Liberation Hypothesis: Data from the Field. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 136-148. doi: Doi 10.1007/S10979-008-9144-X
Dijksterhuis, A., Spears, R., & Lépinasse, V. (2001). Reflecting and Deflecting Stereotypes: Assimilation and Contrast in Impression Formation and Automatic Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 286-299. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1449
Eisenberg, T., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., & Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(1), 171-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.x
Esqueda, C. W., Espinoza, R. K. E., & Culhane, S. E. (2008). The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Euopean American and Mexican American Mock Jurors. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30(2), 181-199. doi: 10.1177/0739986308315319
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition: Topics in social psychology. New York: Random House.
Gemberling, T. M., & Cramer, R. J. (2014). Expert testimony on sensitive myth-ridden topics: Ethics and recommendations for psychological professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 120-127. doi: 10.1037/a0036184
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509-517. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509
Gordon, R. A., Bindrim, T. A., McNicholas, M. L., & Walden, T. L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(2), 191.
Greenberg, J., Williams, K. D., & O'Brien, M. K. (1986). Considering the Harshest Verdict First: Biasing Effects on Mock Juror Verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 41-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167286121005
Greene, E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards: American Psychological Association.
Hastie, R. (1994). Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (2013). Inside the jury: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
Horowitz, I. A., & Bordens, K. S. (2000). The consolidation of plaintiffs: The effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 909-918.
Kaye, D. H., Hans, V. P., Dann, B. M., Farley, E., & Albertson, S. (2007). Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 797-834. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00107.x
Kim, Y. S., Barak, G., & Shelton, D. E. (2009). Examining the “CSI-effect” in the cases of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony: Multivariate and path analyses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(5), 452-460. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.07.005
Koehler, J. J. (2001). When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 493.
Koehler, J. J., & Kaye, D. (1991). Can jurors understand probabilistic evidence? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 154(1), 75-81.
Kruttschnitt, C. (1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(3), 213 - 232.
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37-47.
Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315-1344.
McCoy, M. L., & Gray, J. M. (2007). The impact of defendant gender and relationship to victim on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1578 - 1593.
McKimmie, B. M., Masters, J. M., Masser, B. M., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2013). Stereotypical and Counterstereotypical Defendants: Who Is He and What Was the Case Against Her? Psychology Public Policy and Law, 19(3), 343-354. doi: Doi 10.1037/A0030505
McKimmie, B. M., Newton, C. J., Terry, D. J., & Schuller, R. A. (2004). Jurors' responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7(2), 131-143.
McKimmie, B. M., Newton, S. A., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2012). It's Not What She Says, It's How She Says It: The Influence of Language Complexity and Cognitive Load on the Persuasiveness of Expert Testimony. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(4), 578-589. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2012.727068
Michelini, R. L., & Snodgrass, S. R. (1980). Defendant characteristics and juridic decisions. Journal of Research in Personality, 14(3), 340-350. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(80)90017-3
Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2006). The Use of Religion in Death Penalty Sentencing Trials. Law and Human Behavior, 30(6), 675-684. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9056-6
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. 51, 242-258. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
Podlas, K. (2005). The 'CSI Effect': Exposing the media myth Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 16(2), 429-465.
Pruitt, C. R., & Wilson, J. Q. (1983). A Longitudinal Study of the Effect of Race on Sentencing. Law & Society Review, 17(4), 613-635. doi: 10.2307/3053490
Saulters-Tubbs, C. (1993). Prosecutorial and judicial treatment of female offenders. Federal Probation, 57, 37.
Schuller, R. A., Terry, D. J., & McKimmie, B. M. (2001). The impact of an expert's gender on jurors' decisions. Law and Psychology Review, 25, 59-79.
Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects the public's expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics, 47(3), 357-364. doi: 10.2307/29762978
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Espinoza, P. (2004). Biased processing of stereotype-incongruency is greater for low than high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 128-135. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00093-3
Seymour, F., Blackwell, S., Calvert, S., & McLean, B. (2013). Counterintuitive Expert Psychological Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Trials in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(4), 511-522. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2013.839930
Shelton, D. E., Kim, Y. S., & Barak, G. (2006). A Study of Juror Expectations and Demands Concerning Scientific Evidence: Does the 'CSI Effect' Exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 9, 330.
Sherman, J. W., Lee, A. Y., Bessnoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 589-606.
Sherman, J. W., Conrey, F. R., & Groom, C. J. (2004). Encoding Flexibility Revisited: Evidence for Enhanced Encoding of Stereotype-Inconsistent Information Under Cognitive Load. Social Cognition, 22(2), 214-232. doi: 10.1521/soco.22.2.214.35464
Smith, V. L. (1991). Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 857-872.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is Preferential Treatment of Female Offenders a Thing of the Past? A Multisite Study of Gender, Race, and Imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149-184.
Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., & McWethy, A. (2006). The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instruction to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 469-492. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7
Stephenson, G. M. (1992). The psychology of criminal justice: Blackwell Publishing.
Stern, L. D., Marrs, S., Millar, M. G., & Cole, E. (1984). Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 253-262.
Stewart, R. C. (1980). Identification and investigation of organized criminal activity: National College of District Attorneys.
Vidmar, N., & Diamond, S. S. (2001). Juries and expert evidence. Brooklyn Law Review, 66(4), 1121-1180.
Viki, G. T., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: Benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 109-120. doi: 10.1348/135532504X15277
Wayne, J. H., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, K. M. (2001). Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 179-187.
Worrall, A. (1981). Out of place: Female offenders in court. Probation Journal, 28(3), 90-93.
Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2005). Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153(4), 1251-1345. doi: 10.2307/4150614
Episode 7
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70. doi: 10.1037/h0093718
Baron, R. S., Hoppe, S. I., Kao, C. F., Brunsman, B., Linneweh, B., & Rogers, D. (1996). Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 537-560. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0024
Baron, R. S., & Roper, G. (1976). Reaffirmation of social comparison views of choice shifts: Averaging and extremity effects in an autokinetic situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 521-530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.521
Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 915-927. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915
Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63-67. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397282
Brewer, N., Harvey, S., & Semmler, C. (2004). Improving Comprehension of Jury Instructions with Audio-Visual Presentation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(6), 765-776. doi: 10.1002/acp.1036
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1973). Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(2), 123-137. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90004-8
Casper, J. D., & Benedict, K. M. (1993). The influence of outcome information and attitudes on juror decision making in search and seizure cases Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 65-83). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable - Psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79(7), 1306-1374.
Committee, M. (1965). Report of the Morris Departmental Committee on jury service.
Cutler, B. L., & Hughes, D. M. (2001). Judging jury service: Results of the North Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(2), 305-320. doi: 10.1002/bsl.439
Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622-727.
Diamond, S. S., & Casper, J. D. (1992). Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequence: Damages, experts, and the civil jury. Law and Society Review, 26(3), 513-563.
Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2010). Getting to (not) guilty: examining jurors' deliberative processes in, and beyond, the context of a mock rape trial. Legal Studies, 30(1), 74-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00141.x
Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1(2), 163-189. doi: 10.1007/bf01053437
Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 116-141. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2758
Fodor, E. M., & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 178-185. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.178
Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2006). Information sampling and group decision making: The effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 31-42. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.31
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). The Evolution of the American Jury Judging the Jury (pp. 31-44): Springer US
Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (1994). Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experiment. Law and Human Behavior, 18(2), 121-150. doi: 10.1007/bf01499012
Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (1994). Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18(1), 29-51. doi: 10.1007/bf01499142
Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(1), 77-100.
Jackson, J. D. (1992). Law's truth, lay truth and lawyers' truth: The representation of evidence in adversary trials. Law and Critique, 3(1), 29-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01128242
Kalvin, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American Jury. Boston: Little Brown.
Kaplan, M. F. (1977). Discussion polarization effects in a modified jury decision paradigm: Informational influences. Sociometry, 40, 262–271.
Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1443-1455.
Lieberman, J. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2009). Jury psychology: Social aspects of trial processes: Ashgate.
Manzo, J. F. (1996). Taking Turns and Taking Sides: Opening Scenes from Two Jury Deliberations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(2), 107-125. doi: 10.2307/2787046
McCabe, S., & Purves, R. (1974). The Shadow Jury at Work: An Account of a Series of Deliberations and Verdicts where" shadow" Juries Were Present During Actual Trials: Blackwell for the Oxford University Penal Research Unit.
McGuire, W. J. (1981). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. E. Rice & W. J. Paisley (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 41-70). Beverly Hills, California: Sage
McKimmie, B. M., Emma, A., & Baguley, C. (2014). Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 163-183. doi: 10.1525/nclr.2014.17.2.163
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125-135.
Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25(2), 189-204. doi: 10.1177/1046496494252003
Nathanson, H. (1995). Strengthening the criminal jury: long overdue. Criminal Law Quarterly, 38, 217-248.
Nemeth, C. J. (1981). Jury Trials: Psychology And Law. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. Volume 14, pp. 309-367): Academic Press
Nemeth, C. J., Connell, J. B., Rogers, J. D., & Brown, K. S. (2001). Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02481.x
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189-206.
Reid, H., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the Jury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reifman, A., Gusick, S. M., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1992). Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 539-554.
Rijnbout, J. S., & McKimmie, B. M. (2012). Deviance in organizational group decision-making: The role of information processing, confidence, and elaboration. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(6), 813-828. doi: 10.1177/1368430212447136
Rijnbout, J. S., & McKimmie, B. M. (2012). Deviance in group decision making: Group-member centrality alleviates negative consequences for the group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 915-923. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1917
Rijnbout, J. S., & McKimmie, B. M. (2014). Deviance in organizational decision making: using unanimous decision rules to promote the positive effects and alleviate the negative effects of deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(7), 455-463. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12238
Rose, V. G., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2001). Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example. Law and Human Behavior, 25(4), 409-431.
Saks, M. J. (1977). Jury verdicts: The role of group size and social decision rule. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Saks, M. J., & Hastie, R. (1978). Social psychology in court. Oxford, England: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Sandys, M. (1995). Kentucky Capital Jury Project in Progress: Guided Discretion or Negotiated Peace of Mind?(Part II). Advocate, 17(1), 14-19.
Sandys, M., & Dillehay, R. C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 175-195.
Sarat, A. (1994). Violence, Represenation, and the Responsibility in Capital Trials: The View from the Jury. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1103-1136.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655-669.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(2), 563-586. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00001-8
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1993). Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy On Strategic Decision-Making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 126-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01056.x
Severance, L. J., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1992). Inferring the criminal mind: Toward a bridge between legal doctrine and psychological understanding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(2), 107-120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(92)90002-Q
Severance, L. J., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions. Law & Society Review, 17(1), 153-197. doi: 10.2307/3053535
Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 121-134. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00893.x
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(5), 393-422. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 81-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81
Stephenson, G. M. (1992). The psychology of criminal justice: Blackwell Publishing.
Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 95-113. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<95::AID-EJSP847>3.0.CO;2-0
Thomas, G. C., & Pollack, B. S. (1992). Rethinking Guilt, Juries, and Jeopardy. Michigan Law Review, 91(1), 1-33. doi: 10.2307/1289787
Vinokur, A., & Burnstein, E. (1978). Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 335-348. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420080306
Zander, M. & Henderson, P. (1993) Crown Court Study Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 19. London: HMSO.
Episode 8
Blackburn, R. (1996). What is forensic psychology?*. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(1), 3-16. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00304.x
Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63-67. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397282
Doob, A., N., & Roberts, J. V. (1984). Social psychology, social attitudes, and attitudes towards sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences 16(4), 269-280.
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 288-299. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
Harley, E. M. (2007). Hindsight Bias In Legal Decision Making. Social Cognition, 25(1), 48-63. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48
Hough, M., Lewis, H., & Walker, N. (1988). Factors associated with 'punitiveness' in England and Wales. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries (Vol. LIX, pp. 203-217). Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.
Indermaur, D. (1987). Public perception of sentencing in Perth, Western Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20, 163-183.
Roberts, J. V., & Hough, M. (Eds.). (2002). Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime, and justice. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
Stalans, L. J. (1993). Citizens' crime stereotypes, biased recall, and punishment preferences in abstract cases: The educative role of interpersonal sources. Law and Human Behavior, 17(4), 451-470.
Stalans, L. J., & Diamond, S. S. (1990). Formation and change in lay evaluations of criminal sentencing: Misperception and discontent. Law and Human Behavior, 14(3), 199-214.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.